31
Aug

Duck Decoys: History and Theory

   Posted by: writer   in Software

Duck decoys have a long and interesting history uncovered by archaeologists in 1924. They found 11 handmade duck decoys made of tule reeds, bulrush and duck feathers. Even these days these are the oldest recognized duck decoys, dating back to 200 A.D. Joel Barber was named “the father of the decoy” which is attributed to his collections, carvings and exhibitions.

The purpose of duck decoys are to draw in live ducks for hunters to shoot and bag. With the correct placement of decoys and also the right number of decoys you will attract other live ducks to join the group. One theory is that if you have done your job well, other ducks will land thinking it’s a secure, safe area.

You are able to also equate this illustration to driving by a restaurant that’s packed with cars and another that only sports one or two. Which restaurant do you think has the greatest food? The greater ducks convinced to land near the decoys the better the hunt.

You can find probably just as many duck decoy theories on how to attract a excellent numerous ducks as you can find fish stories? Hunters of every description and nationality have some formula for attracting ducks. Some hunters believe the larger number of decoys on display will always draw in the most ducks.

You can find those hunters that still believe that nothing will do but wooden decoys with effective realistic paint jobs. Some hunters who use the more duck decoys is better theory, are heavily convinced that light weight plastic decoys are the method to go.

Plastic decoys do provide the benefit of being lightweight and simple to transport to difficult locations. No matter what materials are used to produce duck decoys the final effect must be realistic sizes, shapes and colours. The more efficient the decoys, the greater successful the hunt.

Malware problems get the spyware doctor with antivirus download here.

This entry was posted on Tuesday, August 31st, 2010 at 1:44 pm and is filed under Software. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a reply

Name (*)
Mail (will not be published) (*)
URI
Comment